Ask Yourself Whether You Are Happy? Then Notice That When
You Do, You Cease To Be So ¾ The Laws Of Paradox At Work!
A long time ago, long before I ever considered writing these
lines, I made an interesting discovery.
At the time of making it, it was more of an observation than a
discovery. It took all the intervening time for me to realize I had made a
discovery, I suppose it was the slowest epiphany on record.
What I also discovered was that most people have been aware
of this phenomenon since the dawn of time.
Yet, I think the word discovery is appropriate, because even
though it was well known, I had never come across it described or theoretically
explained in any of the psychological, sociological, philosophical or
psychiatric literature I had studied over the years: which in my case primarily
happens to be psychology.
So, directly or indirectly, or intentionally or
unintentionally, I spent the intervening 20 or so years, nearly a quarter
century, investigating this elusive phenomenon, through the facility of my
practice of psychotherapy.
Here is the observation I had noticed a
long time ago; happiness is not something that happens randomly. This thing has form and it follows rules and
they seem to be:
· Happiness
does not happen because of good luck or because the fickle finger of fate picks
you out for some grand event. No one
is special and conversely no one is non-special.
· Happiness is
not something that can be purchased nor can it be controlled or for that matter
caused to occur on command by some grand authority. Although many have tried.
· Happiness
does not depend on the world about us, although conversely the world about us
can affect some of the various outcomes of its occurrences.
· Happiness
seems to be more an interpretation of the world both about us and within us,
with all of this being taken in some sort of strange mix or recipe that is
constantly changing and is difficult to replicate. The formula might not work the second time
the way it did the first time.
· Happiness, in
fact, seems to be a condition that we must be prepared for, that we must
cultivate and nurture, and then be prepared, if necessary to defend, but not
from a place of unity but rather from a place of deep privacy¾as an
individual.
· The
variations on the happiness formulas seem to be more effective
with those people who have learned to work with inner experience(s). It seems
that they will, to a certain degree, be able to determine the quality of their
lives as it relates to having or not having happiness.
· The ability
to determine the having or not having of the presence of
happiness seems to be as close as any of us can come to causing happy to
happen. It can be a conscious decision
to be or not to be, pardon the pun, but not always.
·
It also seems a given that we cannot reach
happiness by consciously searching for it.
The very effort of trying to search for it seems to defeat our every
effort to have or possess it. Happiness
cannot be owned; it can only be experienced.
·
Happiness seems to be the process of being fully
involved with every detail of your life, subjectively not
objectively.
· The key
statement in describing the process of being involved in life seems to
be as completely as possible, and completely as possible
does not seem to depend on any opinion or definition of what is good or bad or
how those cognitive markers of good or bad are held in the mind of the
beholder. Just because you are
prepared to fight to the death for your beliefs doesn’t mean they are true.
· Happiness
seems to occur because of the intensity of the involvement with life and not in
the outcomes that intensity seems to want to provide so that it could be easily
seen and judged by others.
· Degree of
intensity of the involvement necessary to induce happiness will vary from individual
to individual as well as from situation-to-situation. Thus it follows that degrees of intensity
i.e. very intense to mildly intense are not markers that can determine the
outcome of creating happiness. It is
just a necessary factor that varies from time to time.
· The Laws
Of Paradox seems to affect the outcome of having some or not; for instance:
don't aim for it because the Laws Of Paradox will tend
to cause you to increase the size and shape of the target you have set for
yourself and then at the same time cause you to miss with greater frequency.
Something like Chinese handcuffs,
the harder you try the more difficult it becomes.
· Happiness and
success cannot be pursued for their own sake.
· Happiness and
success, to be most effective must sneak up from behind and envelop us ... It
is something that happens to us while we are busy doing something else … as
the inadvertent, unintentional after-effect of our efforts to simply get on
with the business of being ourselves and by doing whatever is next simply
because it is there and needs to be done.
Then this seems to need to be taken into consideration with the effort
made by the individual to be willing to work in the shadow of his or her
spiritual self and then deliberately attempting to work with the spiritual
forces of the Greater Way of Things.
·
Again paradox.
The Art of Trying Not to Try.
· So how can we
reach this elusive goal that cannot be attained by a direct route? My practice and practices of the past 20 or
so years has convinced me that there is a way.
· It is a
circuitous path of going nowhere the long way in search of someone who was not
lost and there all along … You. And it can only begin with a willingness by the
participant to want to make the journey.